Frederick Daily Voice serves the towns of: Adamstown, Ballenger Creek, Brunswick, Frederick, Green Valley, Linganore, Middletown, Spring Ridge, Thurmont, Urbana, Walkersville. (a)the documents given to the officer under regulation 30(1); (b)the documents provided by the officer under, (ii)where paragraph (7) applies, regulation 54, and, (i)does not accept that the conduct amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct, as the case may be, or. (3)Paragraph (4) applies where disciplinary action for gross misconduct is imposed. (4)The appropriate authority may not suspend a police officer under this regulation unless the following conditions (the suspension conditions) are satisfied, (a)having considered temporary redeployment to alternative duties or an alternative location as an alternative to suspension, the appropriate authority has determined that such redeployment is not appropriate in all the circumstances of the case, and, (b)it appears to the appropriate authority that either, (i)the effective investigation of the case may be prejudiced unless the officer concerned is so suspended, or. 42.(1)The person conducting or chairing misconduct proceedings may, subject to the provisions of this regulation. take no further action against the officer concerned; refer the matter to the reflective practice review process, or, refer the matter to be dealt with under the Performance Regulations, and, the appropriate authority must as soon as practicable give the officer concerned, written notice of the direction, indicating whether any action will be taken under paragraph (2)(a), and. whether it appears that the alleged gross misconduct has had an effect on relations between the public and the police, including relations between the members of the community where the alleged gross misconduct occurred and the police force concerned; the extent of any apparent harm to public confidence in the police, and, in particular, in the police force concerned; the effect that a decision not to take disciplinary proceedings might have on public confidence in the police, and, When assessing the public interest for the purposes of paragraph (2)(c), the matters which the Director General must take into account are, whether it appears that the officer concerned should be prevented from future employment or appointment by a person mentioned in section 88C(5) of the 1996 Act (effect of inclusion in police barred list: persons who may not employ or otherwise appoint a barred person). (12)Where a period is extended, paragraph (2) or, as the case may be, paragraph (6), has effect as if for the period specified in those provisions there were substituted the extended period. the appropriate authority decides, following a review, that the suspension conditions are no longer satisfied; either of the events mentioned in paragraph (5)(a) and (b). (10)The police friend or relevant lawyer of the officer concerned may not answer any questions asked of the officer during the accelerated misconduct hearing. (7)A misconduct pre-hearing may be conducted by telephone or by such other electronic means as may be agreed between the parties, or, where the parties fail to agree, as decided by the chair. (3)Any person to whom this paragraph applies may make written representations to the chair in relation to. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE DIRECTIVE . Tickets and citations are documents that charge you with a violation of traffic law. (2)The appropriate authority or, as the case may be, the originating authority, must, as soon as practicable after receiving the report under paragraph (1), notify the officer concerned of the outcome by sending the officer a copy of, (a)the report submitted under paragraph (1), and. (16)The person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing must not find that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to gross misconduct unless. (b)stating the grounds of appeal and whether a meeting is requested. S.I. (b)assist the appropriate authority to establish whether there is a case to answer in respect of misconduct or gross misconduct or whether there is no case to answer. This is likely to happen if you have no previous traffic violations and the violation was not severe. These Regulations are to be read as if Part 6 were omitted. (6)The person representing the appropriate authority or, as the case may be, the originating authority may, (a)address the proceedings in order to do any or all of the following. A warning ticket means that you did something illegal (e.g. (2)The disciplinary action available at a misconduct meeting is, (3)The disciplinary action available at a misconduct hearing is, (a)where the person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings decides the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to misconduct, in accordance with regulation 41(15). (c)if the appropriate authority determines the officer has no case to answer, whether there may have been a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that would have justified the bringing of disciplinary proceedings had the officer still been serving.; (i)in sub-paragraph (a), misconduct (within the meaning of paragraph 29 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act) or were omitted; (ii)for sub-paragraphs (b) to (d), there were substituted. an appeal from misconduct proceedings or from an accelerated misconduct hearing under the Police Appeals Tribunals Rules 2020(15), but, for the purposes of the following provisions, disciplinary proceedings only includes misconduct proceedings mentioned in paragraph (a) and a hearing mentioned in paragraph (b) of this definition. When making a Condition C special determination the Director General must take into account in addition to the matters specified in regulation 4A. (a)there is sufficient evidence, in the form of written statements or other documents, to establish on the balance of probabilities that the conduct of the officer concerned constitutes gross misconduct, and. the person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing must notify the officer concerned prior to the hearing. (2)The investigator must as soon as practicable after being appointed draw up the terms of reference of the investigation. The police officer gives these warnings as a wake-up call for the traffic law violator so that he or she can reflect back and determine why they were pulled over in the first place. the Director General may attend the accelerated misconduct hearing to make representations. reduction in rank, where paragraph (5) or (6) applies; dismissal without notice, where paragraph (5) or (6) applies; where the person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings decides the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to gross misconduct, in accordance with regulation 41(15), a period of 18 months beginning with the day on which it was notified to the officer concerned, in the case of a written warning, or. Your letter will be placed in your personnel file along with the written warning. According to Acas, a written warning is "a formal warning that the employer can give the employee at the end of the disciplinary procedure." (Note: At the end, not the beginning!) (2)The appropriate authority must appoint a person to investigate the matter. the conduct that is the subject matter of the allegation and how that conduct is alleged to fall below the Standards of Professional Behaviour; that there is to be an investigation into the matter and the identity of the investigator; the result of the severity assessment conducted under regulation 14; the result of any assessment under regulation 14(5)(b) as to whether any misconduct proceedings would likely be a misconduct meeting or a misconduct hearing; that if the officer is dismissed at misconduct proceedings, information including the officers full name and a description of the conduct which led to dismissal will be added to the police barred list and may be subject to publication for a period of up to 5 years; that the officer has the right to seek advice from the officers staff association or any other body and of the effect of regulation 7(1) and (2); the effect of regulations 8(1) to (3) and 18, and. However, the police officer is within their right to write you a ticket for the expired tags as well. There are amendments to paragraph 29, but none are relevant. (2)The misconduct proceedings must not proceed unless the officer concerned has been notified of the effect of regulation 8(1) to (3) in relation to the form of misconduct proceedings taking place. (iii)prohibit the publication of any matter under regulation 39(3)(c). These Regulations are to be read as if regulation 11 were omitted. (b)the officer proposes an alternative date or time which satisfies paragraph (5). Cordner et al. subject to the harm test, give the officer a copy of the investigators report or such parts of that report as relate to the officer. I honestly had no clue why he pulled me over. (8)Where the person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing finds that the conduct of the officer concerned does not amount to gross misconduct, they may. on receipt of any representations under paragraph (7); if there has been no previous review, before the end of 4 weeks beginning with the first working day after the suspension; when it becomes aware that circumstances relevant to the suspension conditions may have changed (whether by means of representations made under paragraph (7)(b) or otherwise), or. (8)Any such application must set out the reasons for the application. whether disciplinary action for gross misconduct was imposed. (11)In making a decision under paragraph (10), the person chairing the misconduct hearing may have regard to any representations, (a)provided under regulation 36(3) or (5), or. (10)In making a decision under paragraph (9), the person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing may have regard to any representations, (a)provided under regulation 53(3) or (5), or. (i)conducting or and or misconduct meeting were omitted; (ii)in sub-paragraph (a), person or were omitted; (iii)for sub-paragraphs (c) and (d), there were substituted. the finding of the person or persons conducting the misconduct proceedings; any direction that the matter be dealt with under the reflective practice review process. A written warning ticket is a document issued by law enforcement officers to let you know that they noticed an infraction on the road (speeding, parking, etc.). (a)having determined that the officer concerned has a case to answer in respect of gross misconduct, those proceedings must be a misconduct hearing; (b)where the officer had a final written warning in force at the date of the severity assessment under regulation 14(1) of these Regulations or, as the case may be, regulation 16 of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations (special procedure: severity assessment), those proceedings must be a misconduct hearing; (c)where the officer has been reduced in rank under the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2004(45) or these Regulations less than 2 years prior to the severity assessment under regulation 14(1) of these Regulations or, as the case may be, regulation 16 of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations, those proceedings must be a misconduct hearing, and. (8)The circumstances in which the Independent Office for Police Conduct is a relevant authority for the purpose of section 84(5) of the 1996 Act (power to prescribe in regulations, in relation to representation at proceedings, circumstances in which the relevant authority includes the Independent Office for Police Conduct) are prescribed as being where the Director General has made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present the case. Most warnings are removed from police department computers after about a year. (3)Where, on the date of the severity assessment under regulation 14(1) of these Regulations or under regulation 16 of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations, the officer concerned had a final written warning in force, a final written warning must not be given. (ia)in the case of a Condition C person, any written statement or document provided to the Director General under regulation 4B(3) and any response to a consultation carried out under regulation 4B(4), and; (b)in paragraph (2), conducting or were omitted; (i)in sub-paragraph (a), for conduct or, as the case may be, chair, there were substituted chair; (ii)in sub-paragraph (b), conducting or, as the case may be, were omitted; (i)conduct or, as the case may be, were omitted; (e)in paragraph (6), and (7) were omitted; (a)in paragraph (1)(b), conducting or were omitted; (b)in paragraph (2)(a), (b) and (c), misconduct or and , as the case may be were omitted; (c)in paragraph (2)(c)(ii), person or were omitted. provide the Director General with a copy of the written notice given under paragraph (1). (5)The person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings may, at the persons discretion, put any questions to the officer concerned that the complainant or interested person may request be put to the officer. (4)When assessing the impact of the allegation on public confidence in the police for the purposes of paragraph (2)(b), the matters which the Director General must take into account are. (i)at the beginning, there were inserted Subject to paragraph (6A),; (ii)misconduct or and or neither were omitted; (b)in paragraph (2), for the words from amount, in the first place that word occurs, to the end, there were substituted not amount to gross misconduct, it must take no further action.; (ii)for the words from misconduct or to the end, there were substituted gross misconduct, the matter must be investigated.; (e)in paragraph (6), at the beginning, there were inserted Subject to paragraph (6A),; (f)after paragraph (6), there were inserted, (6A)The appropriate authority must take no action or no further action under paragraph (1), (5) or (6) if , (a)it is satisfied that the officer concerned is unfit for disciplinary proceedings to be brought against the officer by reason of disability or ill-health, or.